Not on their own. For ordinary consumer debt a collector must sue you, win, and obtain a judgment before it can touch a paycheck. Which means the moment that decides whether you are ever garnished is not the garnishment — it is whether you responded to the lawsuit.
And even with a judgment, there are hard limits.
The federal cap
For consumer debt, a garnishment may take no more than the lesser of:
- 25% of your disposable earnings (gross pay minus legally required deductions), or
- the amount by which your weekly disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum wage, which at $7.25 is $217.50 a week.
So if your weekly disposable earnings are $250, only $32.50 can be taken. If they are $217.50 or less, nothing can be garnished for consumer debt. That floor is a genuine protection and it is the basis of most successful exemption claims.
Different, higher limits apply to child support, federal taxes and federal student loans — those are separate regimes, not exceptions within this one.
Four states where it largely cannot happen at all
Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and South Carolina substantially prohibit wage garnishment for ordinary consumer debt. Exceptions exist in each — child support, taxes, federally guaranteed student loans — so this is not absolute protection, but for a credit card judgment it is close.
Many other states are more protective than the federal floor, either by raising the exempt amount or lowering the percentage. Your state’s rule governs where it is more favorable to you than federal law, so check the state statute rather than stopping at the federal cap.
The bank account is a different question
People conflate these two and they operate differently.
Wage garnishment intercepts money before it reaches you, capped as above, and continues paycheck after paycheck until the judgment is satisfied.
A bank levy freezes and takes money already in your account, in one action, and the wage-garnishment percentage caps do not apply to funds sitting in an account.
That difference matters practically: money that was protected as wages loses much of that protection once it is deposited, with one significant exception — federal benefit payments deposited directly are protected by rules that require banks to preserve a look-back amount of those deposits automatically. On receiving a garnishment order the bank must review the two months of account activity ending the day before the review, and leave untouched the lesser of the benefit payments posted in that window or the balance in the account. That protection applies by itself: no exemption claim, no hearing, nothing you have to file.
What income cannot be garnished for consumer debt
- Social Security retirement, SSDI and SSI
- VA benefits
- Federal employee and military retirement, in most circumstances
- Public assistance and unemployment benefits, in most states
- Workers’ compensation, in most states
- Child support you receive
These are protected from ordinary creditors. They are not all protected from the federal government itself, which can offset certain benefits for federal debts including taxes and defaulted federal student loans, within limits.
What they can reach besides wages
With a judgment: bank accounts, a lien on real property in many states, and in some states other non-exempt personal property. Vehicles are usually protected up to a state exemption amount, which is why “can a debt collector take my car” — a real search — is generally answered no for a modest vehicle, and not always no for a valuable one.
The point where you can still stop this
Answering the lawsuit. Debt collection cases are overwhelmingly decided by default judgment, and a default judgment is how most garnishments come to exist. Filing a written answer by the deadline on the summons keeps the case a negotiation instead of an enforcement action. Before any of that, there is a 30-day window most people miss: the validation notice and what it obliges.
That is worth restating because it inverts the usual anxiety: the frightening part is not the collector’s power, it is the missed deadline that hands it over. See the point where you can still prevent it and how they get the judgment.
If a garnishment has already started, there are five routes to stopping it — how to stop one that has started — and filing bankruptcy stops it the same day.
What a collector cannot do
Under federal law, a debt collector cannot:
- Threaten garnishment it has no legal right to pursue, or imply a court process exists when it does not
- Threaten arrest for the debt
- Call before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. your local time
- Discuss your debt with third parties, including your employer, beyond limited location-information contact
- Continue contacting you after you request in writing that it stop
Threatening wage garnishment without a judgment — or in a state where it is prohibited — is a violation worth documenting.
Where collection complaints cluster, per 100,000 residents
Garnishments are not counted anywhere you can look up, state by state. Collection complaints are. We pulled every debt collection complaint the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau received in the twelve months to September 1, 2026 — 324,326 of them — split them by state, and divided each state by its Census Bureau population estimate for 2024. The national figure is 94.3 complaints per hundred thousand residents.
The spread around that average is what the national figure hides. Georgia is highest at 237.1 per hundred thousand, from 26,507 complaints. Puerto Rico is lowest at 9.7, from 311. That is 24.4 times between the top and the bottom of one federal database, over the same twelve months, under the same federal collection rules.
The ranking is worth reading against the garnishment map, because the two do not line up. Of the four states that substantially prohibit wage garnishment for consumer debt, South Carolina is second on this list at 222.8 per hundred thousand and Texas fourth at 181.3; North Carolina sits at 119.2, above the national figure, and Pennsylvania at 83.1, below it. A state that blocks garnishment is not a state where collection stops — it is a state where the collector has to use something else. If an order has already started against you, a filing is one of the things that stops it: what bankruptcy does to a garnishment already running.
What normalizing by population does to the ranking
The bureau publishes the count, not the rate, and the two give different answers. Dividing by population moves states a long way. California is third by raw count, with 28,787 complaints, and twentieth by rate at 73.0 per hundred thousand. New York is seventh by count and twenty‑fourth by rate. It moves the other way too: the District of Columbia is 39th by count and 13th by rate, and Delaware goes from 33rd to ninth.
That is the difference between a list of the biggest states and an answer to the question you asked. A resident of Georgia files collection complaints at more than three times the rate of a resident of California, and the four most populous states are not the four with the most collection pressure. If you are trying to judge your own exposure, the rate column is the one to read, and the count column is mostly a population map.
| State | Complaints | Population, 2024 | Per 100,000 | Rank by count | Rank by rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 56,738 | 31,290,831 | 181.3 | 1 | 4 |
| California | 28,787 | 39,431,263 | 73.0 | 3 | 20 |
| Georgia | 26,507 | 11,180,878 | 237.1 | 4 | 1 |
| New York | 11,977 | 19,867,248 | 60.3 | 7 | 24 |
| Mississippi | 5,747 | 2,943,045 | 195.3 | 18 | 3 |
| Delaware | 1,302 | 1,051,917 | 123.8 | 33 | 9 |
| District of Columbia | 653 | 702,250 | 93.0 | 39 | 13 |
How we counted, and what a complaint rate cannot tell you
The counts come from one request per product against the bureau’s documented search API, filtered on the product and on a fixed twelve‑month window of receipt dates, read from the response’s own state aggregation. The denominators come from the Census Bureau’s state population estimates for 2024. Nothing is sampled and nothing is interpolated, and the arithmetic is a division.
The reason to publish it anyway, with the limits below attached, is that the per‑resident view is the only one that answers a personal question, and the bureau does not publish it. The raw counts are already public and already misread: every list of the states with the most collection complaints is, in practice, a list of the states with the most people.
| Source | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, public Consumer Complaint Database, for the counts; U.S. Census Bureau state population estimates, vintage 2024, for the denominator |
|---|---|
| What we asked it | One request against the bureau’s documented search API filtering on the debt collection product and a fixed twelve-month window of receipt dates, reading the state aggregation; each state count then divided by its 2024 population estimate and multiplied by one hundred thousand. |
| Data as of | Complaints received 1 September 2025 to 1 September 2026; population estimates for 2024 |
| Retrieved | September 2, 2026 |
| Assumptions | The rate is ours: the bureau publishes counts and does not publish a per-resident figure; complaints the bureau records with no state are excluded from the state rows and kept in the national total; the population estimate is a single 2024 vintage, so the denominator does not move across the complaint window |
| How to repeat it | Filter the public complaint database by product and receipt date, take the state breakdown, and divide each state by its population in the Census state totals file. |
What this does not say.
- A complaint is a complaint, not a finding. Nothing here says a collector broke the law in Georgia or obeyed it in Vermont.
- The rate measures willingness to complain as much as collector behavior. A state with more consumer advice, more legal aid and more awareness of the bureau will rank higher without anything being collected differently.
- This does not count garnishments, and it cannot. The orders are issued by state courts that do not report to any single place, and the bureau does not collect them, so a high complaint rate is not evidence of a high garnishment rate.
- The two sides of the division come from different years: population is a 2024 estimate and the complaints run to 2026. In a fast-growing or fast-shrinking state that pushes the rate slightly in one direction.
- About 0.1% of collection complaints reach the bureau without a state recorded, so the state rows do not add up to the national total.
Frequently asked questions
Can a debt collector garnish my wages without a court order? Not for ordinary consumer debt. The collector has to sue, win and obtain a judgment first, which is why the deadline on the summons matters more than anything the collector says on the phone. Federal student loans and federal tax debt are the exceptions: those can be garnished administratively, under separate rules.
How much of my paycheck can they take? For consumer debt, the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings or the amount by which weekly disposable earnings exceed thirty times the federal minimum wage. Below that floor nothing can be taken, and many states are more protective than the federal rule, so check your state statute rather than stopping at the federal cap.
Can debt collectors garnish wages in Texas? Texas substantially prohibits wage garnishment for ordinary consumer debt, with exceptions for child support, taxes and federally guaranteed student loans. It is not a quiet state for collection, though: Texas is fourth in the country for collection complaints per resident, at 181.3 per 100,000. Bank accounts are a separate question and are not equally protected.
Can they take money from my bank account? With a judgment, yes, through a levy — and the percentage caps that protect wages do not apply to money already sitting in an account. Directly deposited federal benefits are the exception: the bank has to review two months of activity and leave the protected amount alone, automatically, without you filing anything.
Can they garnish Social Security? Not for ordinary consumer debt. A credit card judgment cannot reach Social Security retirement, disability or supplemental income. The federal government itself can offset some benefits for certain federal debts, including taxes and defaulted federal student loans, within limits that are narrower than most people assume.
This article explains garnishment limits in general terms. It is not legal advice. Exemption amounts, procedures and prohibitions are state law and vary substantially, and different rules apply to support, tax and student loan debt. Get advice specific to your state.
Sources
- 15 U.S.C. §1673 (CCPA Title III) — restriction on garnishment: the 25% and 30-times-minimum-wage caps
- 31 CFR Part 212 — garnishment of accounts containing federal benefit payments: the two-month lookback and protected amount
- Your state’s exemption statute
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — Consumer Complaint Database, debt collection product, complaints received September 1, 2025 to September 1, 2026 (accessed 2026-09-02)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — Consumer Complaint Database API documentation (accessed 2026-09-02)
- U.S. Census Bureau — state population totals and components of change, vintage 2024 data file (accessed 2026-09-02)
Information, not advice. How we calculate, source and review this — and what we do not do — is set out on our methods and sourcing page.